===== Oct 19 (Mon) Section 3.2 to ? =====
** Responsible party: spillane, physics4dummies **
**To go back to the lecture note list, click [[lec_notes]]**\\
**previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_1016]]**\\
**next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1021]]**\\
**Main class wiki page: [[home]]**
Please try to include the following
* main points understood, and expand them - what is your understanding of what the points were.
* expand these points by including many of the details the class discussed.
* main points which are not clear. - describe what you have understood and what the remain questions surrounding the point(s).
* Other classmates can step in and clarify the points, and expand them.
* How the main points fit with the big picture of QM. Or what is not clear about how today's points fit in in a big picture.
* wonderful tricks which were used in the lecture.\\
\\
Define Hilbert space- Hilbert space contains the set of all square-integrable functions, on a specified interval (usually ±∞, but more generally (a and b)\\
\\
where all functions that have this property make up a vector space we call Hilbert space. Hilbert space is real space that contains the inner product of two functions defined as follows:\\
if f and g are both square-integrable the inner product is guaranteed to exist, if the inner product does not exist the then diverges \\ *Notation relationships \\ We claim that the operator ⇔. Here we introduce new short hand notation , where is a unit vector.\\
For example could represent the ground state wave function. That is\\ Back to the claim made. Is this a sensible claim?\\
So, we speculate that = that is to say for example if A and B are vectors then A⋅B=\\
We begin by inspecting that if \\
so (where i and j are independent)\\
Then we can say this equals where Which we know equals one if i=j and eauals zero if i≠j\\
∴ whooooo!\\
*This time we claim that which is the same as here we recognize that both are vectors and that Q is like a matrix.
We begin by examining \\
We want to check that
So we speculate \\
With this in mind \\
So we speculate \\
With this in mind \\
=\\
=\\
= ∴ whooooo\\
*There was also a question asked in class. What exactly the question was i dont remember could somebody help?\\
However the discussion went something like this:\\
In general analogous to \\ where and \\
Discribe a plane wave function. If which can be thought of as a stationary state of momentum. Which implies that\\ \\
Consider then, which is proportional to
and normalizing in this fashion.\\Next, stationary states are Hamiltonian eigenstates and ⇔ momentum eigenstate. This means that if \\
So is the probability density i.e. the likely hood of finding a momentum value.\\
therefor if you let then then is now equal to
--------------------------------------
**To go back to the lecture note list, click [[lec_notes]]**\\
**previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_1016]]**\\
**next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1021]]**\\