===== Nov 18 (Wed) closure for L, Starting Spins ===== ** Responsible party: Ekrpat, chap0326 ** **To go back to the lecture note list, click [[lec_notes]]**\\ **previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_1116]]**\\ **next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1120]]**\\ **Main class wiki page: [[home]]** ==Topics covered in lecture:== * Making sense of the Del Operator * Beginning spin ===Making sense of the Del Operator=== When shown that \mathbf{\vec{ \nabla}} = \mathbf{\hat r} \partial r + \mathbf{\hat \theta} {\partial \theta \over r} + \mathbf{\hat \phi}{\partial \phi \over r\sin(\theta)} we were asked "does this make sense?" (DTMS) We then recalled that \mathbf{\vec{ \nabla}} comes from \mathbf{\vec{ \nabla}} = \mathbf{\hat x}\partial x + \mathbf{\hat y}\partial y + \mathbf{\hat z}\partial z and that you could use a brute force type method to get the solution we are looking for from that. Also explained today was another method that involved introducing another Cartesian system: x',y',z', where \mathbf{\vec{ \nabla}} = \mathbf{\hat x'}\partial x' + \mathbf{\hat y'}\partial y' + \mathbf{\hat z'}\partial z', and rotating the coordinates such that it lined up with the r-vector, \theta and \phi. Then it is possible to make a direct transformation from the [x',y',z'] coordinates to the [\mathbf{\hat r}, \theta, \phi] coordinates. We find that \partial x' = \partial r, \partial y' = {\partial \theta \over r}, and \partial z' = {\partial \phi \over r\sin(\theta)} Thus in a more elegant, though perhaps not as readily apparent way, we arrive at the desired expression: \mathbf{\vec{ \nabla}} = \mathbf{\hat r} \partial r + \mathbf{\hat \theta} {\partial \theta \over r} + \mathbf{\hat \phi}{\partial \phi \over r\sin(\theta)} ===Starting Spin=== We first made the note that we started with a quantum state represented by \psi_n which implies that it is a function of x, \psi_n(x). Now we use a more abstract representation |\psi_n>, which doesn't necessarily imply that \psi_n is a function of x. Then from this notation, |\psi_n>, we can go to a matrix vector notation: \psi_n ~ |\psi_n> ~ \Sigma c_n \psi_n ~ $\begin{pmatrix} c_1\\ c_2\\ c_3\\ etc. \end{pmatrix}$ In spin we have something analogous: ~|\chi> ~ c_+\chi_+ + c_-\chi_- which goes to $\begin{pmatrix} c_+\\ c_-\end{pmatrix}$ We paused here to understand what characterizes \chi_+. When you operate with the z-component of the angular momontum, L_z, you get: L_z \chi_+ = \frac{\hbar}{2} \chi_+ This says to us that \chi_+ is an eigenvector of the L_z operator with an eigenvalue of \frac{\hbar}{2} Then we said that \chi_+ ~ |s, s_z> = | \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}> We also made note that the book also calls |s, s_z>: |s, s_z> = |s, m> = |s, m_s> and wondered why we use all these different notations. To explain we recalled from angular momentum that {Y_l}^m ~ {F_l}^m ~ |l, m> If you apply L^2 on it L^2 |l, m> = l(l+1){\hbar}^2 |l,m> L_z |l, m> = m{\hbar} |l,m> L^2 \chi_+ = s(s+1){\hbar}^2 \chi_+ we can begin to see how it makes sense. The 'm' is related to the magnetic quantum number, m_s is to help distinguish between the spin part of the magnetic. s_z indicates we are talking about the z-component. Yuichi says to take a good look at section 4.4 to find what does not make sense to us, so that we know what questions to ask next lecture. ------------------------------------------ **To go back to the lecture note list, click [[lec_notes]]**\\ **previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_1116]]**\\ **next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1120]]**\\