Homestake Meeting Minutes, 12/08/17 Attending: Andrew, Jan, Pat, Ross, Vuk, Daniel, Michael, Gary Agenda: * Next Meeting: Jan 12? * Data analysis topics * Data corrections, frame production (Gary/Daniel/Pat) * Event catalog (Gary/Ross) * Radiometer updates (Pat, Andrew) * Parameter estimation for Rayleigh and Love (Pat) * Teleseismic events and Wiener filtering (Daniel, Michael) * Very-long-periods (Ross) * Velocity from noise correlations (Daniel) * Model selection? * Pull together all velocity measurements to start making comparisons (all) * Papers * Homestake Array Summary paper: * Leads: Vuk, Gary, Victor * Submitted to Seism. Research Lett. * Active excitation overview paper * Leads: Gary, Ross * Others: Victor, Daniel,… * Draft of the paper exists, as a report for IRIS. Gary will be adopting it to a publication. Don't have a particular date in mind. * Vuk: Gary reports via email that he expects to be working on this paper over the holiday break. * Surface Active Excitation * Leads: Victor, Boise * Others: Gary, Ross * Plan to invite the Boise group to give us a presentation in Sep or Oct 2017, when they are ready with their paper. * Underground Active Excitation: * Lead: Gary, Ross * Parameter estimation for the Rayleigh and Love eigenfunctions (amplitude vs depth dependence). * Leads: Pat, Daniel * Also contributing: Victor, Vuk, Levi * Estimating directional and modal composition of the seismic noise. (Pat, Levi, Vuk) * Leads: Pat, Vuk, Levi * Wiener filter application * Leads: Jan, Michael * Latest version: {{:groups:homestake:meetings:wiener.pdf|}}. Needs minor modifications of figure 6, and still need to rewrite conclusions. * Vuk: Why can't you measure seismic speed below 1.2 Hz. * Jan: Not clear, the method should work, it looks like there is a lot of variability around 1Hz, potentially different wave modes. * New point in the paper: evidence of the presence of body waves at 0.2 Hz, based on the speed measurement. Body waves seem to dominate on some days. In fact, it seems there is a continuous body wave background and on some weeks a stronger Rayleigh background overcomes it. Important for GW detectors. * Vuk: suggest to emphasize this to Victor and Gary via email, their response could help place this result in existing geo literature. ALso suggest to plot Fig 6 as a scatter plot, which should appear as -45 degree line. * Daniel: where would body waves come from? * Jan: not sure. * Jan: also have very good Wiener subtraction. Should we try a more visible journal, like Nature geophysics? * Vuk: worth considering, depends on what is known about body vs Rayleigh background. Also, it seems we don't need the depth aspect of this array is not needed for Fig 6. * Jan: correct, could try another array like Sweatwater. * Vuk: Could we use an estimate of Rayleigh wave speed from elsewhere? And plot lambda/4 on the Figure 5. * Ross/Pat: could try to estimate the speed from mining blast data. Pat working on this now, Ross did a study in the past. * Jan: Could use shear wave speed, which was measured, and convert based on some assumption on the poisson ratio. This could be a value for now, that could be updated later from other analyses. * Gary: could use the mine blasts. Have very solid data on shear wave speed from the active excitation at 2000. But this is on the scale 10-100m, but don't know it at a larger scale, but wouldn't expect it to very much. You can also get uncertainty on these velocity measurements. * Jan will send an email summarizing these results. We should discuss how to proceed via email, if necessary we'll schedule another call before the winter break... * Teleseismic EQs and near-surface scattering * Leads: Daniel, Victor * Time-variable velocity changes * Lead: Victor, not started yet * Very low frequency harmonics (Ross)