Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
School of Physics and Astronomy Wiki

User Tools

Trace: • final_exam_1219 • lec_notes_1120 • lec_notes_0930
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:lec_notes_0930

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:lec_notes_0930 [2009/09/30 19:05] – x500_matt0443classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:lec_notes_0930 [2009/10/02 00:07] (current) – yk
Line 5: Line 5:
 **previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_0928]]**\\ **previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_0928]]**\\
 **next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1005]]**\\ **next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1005]]**\\
 +**Important concepts for quiz 1: [[quiz_1_1002]]**\\
  
 **Main class wiki page: [[home]]** **Main class wiki page: [[home]]**
  
-Please try to include the following +//This note complemented my actual lecture with proper factors so that "~" becomes "=", and some parts that perhaps I was not clear (from your faces) were more clearly and completely explained.  Thank you for you the wonderful job.  Yuichi//
- +
-  * main points understood, and expand them - what is your understanding of what the points were. +
-    * expand these points by including many of the details the class discussed. +
-  * main points which are not clear.  - describe what you have understood and what the remain questions surrounding the point(s). +
-    * Other classmates can step in and clarify the points, and expand them.  +
-  * How the main points fit with the big picture of QM.  Or what is not clear about how today's points fit in in a big picture. +
-  * wonderful tricks which were used in the lecture.+
  
 === Main Points === === Main Points ===
Line 44: Line 38:
 Yuichi suggested that we try Problem 2.20 in Griffiths to gain a better understanding. Yuichi suggested that we try Problem 2.20 in Griffiths to gain a better understanding.
  
-== to be finished later tonight ==+==Group Velocity vs. Phase Velocity== 
 +The book defines the group velocity as <math>v_g=\frac{d\omega}{dk}</math>, but what does that mean?  What is the group velocity?  What makes it different from the phase velocity? 
 + 
 +The real part of the wavefunction of a wave packet looks like a sinusoidal function bound within an envelope.  The wavefunction can move faster or slower than the envelope.  The speed of the envelope is the group velocity, and the speed of the waves inside the envelope is the phase velocity. 
 + 
 +The group velocity represents the velocity that we would measure, <math>\frac{d<x>}{dt}</math>.  One may wonder how this can be if <x> is at a place where the wavefunction plotted is 0; the answer is that the plotted part of the wavefunction does not include the imaginary component. The envelope represents the magnitude of the wavefunction (the real and imaginary parts added in quadrature, <math>\|\Psi\|=\sqrt{\Psi^{*}\Psi}=\sqrt{\(Re\(\Psi\)\)^2 + \(Im\(\Psi\)\)^2}</math>). 
 + 
 +So why does <math>v_g = \frac{d\omega}{dt}</math>?  Why would it be different in different systems?  For a quantum mechanical particle, <math>\omega \propto E\propto \frac{p^2}{2m}\propto k^2</math>.  For light, <math>\omega \propto k</math>.  For water waves, <math>\omega \propto \sqrt{k}</math>. 
 + 
 +Suppose that the wave packet has waves corresponding to <math>e^{ikx}</math> and <math>e^{i(k+\Delta k)x}</math>. 
 + 
 +<math>\Psi (x, 0)=e^{ikx}+e^{i(k+\Delta k)x} = e^{i(\frac{k+k+\Delta k}{2})x}\(e^{-i\frac{\Delta k}{2} x}+e^{i\frac{\Delta k}{2} x}\) \\ = \[cos( \frac{(2k+\Delta k)}{2}x ) +i sin(\frac{(2k+\Delta k)}{2}x)\]\(2cos(\frac{\Delta k}{2} x)\)</math> 
 + 
 +The second cosine in the last expression is the envelope, while the first term represents the phase inside the envelope. 
 + 
 + 
 +We can also see that <math>\Psi (x, 0) = e^{ikx}+e^{i(k+\Delta k)x}=\(cos(kx)+cos((k+\Delta k)x)\)+i\(sin(kx) + sin((k+\Delta k)x)\)</math>.  <math>\|\Psi\|</math> will then be at a maximum when the two waves are in phase, <math>kx_g=(k+\Delta k)x_g</math>, where <math>x_g</math> is the x corresponding to a maximum in the envelope.  Taking time into consideration gives 
 + 
 +<math>kx_g - \omega t = (k+\Delta k)x_g - (\omega + \Delta \omega)t</math> 
 + 
 +At <math>t=0</math>, this gives <math>x_g = 0</math>, and at <math>t=\Delta t</math>, it gives <math>x_g=\frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta k}\Delta t</math>.  Then, we can see that 
 + 
 +<math>v_g\approx \frac{\Delta x_g}{\Delta t}\approx \frac{d\omega}{dk}</math>
  
 +with the approximations becoming exact in the limit of small <math>\Delta</math>.
  
  
Line 51: Line 68:
 **To go back to the lecture note list, click [[lec_notes]]**\\ **To go back to the lecture note list, click [[lec_notes]]**\\
 **previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_0928]]**\\ **previous lecture note: [[lec_notes_0928]]**\\
-**next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1002]]**\\+**next lecture note: [[lec_notes_1005]]**\\ 
 +**Important concepts for quiz 1: [[quiz_1_1002]]**\\
  
classes/2009/fall/phys4101.001/lec_notes_0930.1254355520.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/09/30 19:05 by x500_matt0443

Page Tools