Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:lec_notes_1007 [2009/10/07 17:50] – x500_poit0009 | classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:lec_notes_1007 [2009/10/07 18:55] (current) – kuehler | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
< | < | ||
- | < | + | < |
The wave functions end up being: | The wave functions end up being: | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
with < | with < | ||
+ | |||
+ | as opposed to the situation of < | ||
+ | |||
+ | which is defined by the complex equation < | ||
+ | |||
+ | Normally, this would be the case for E>0 thus as k increases so does the energy. Yet, here we are dealing with E<0 so what ultimately happens is that as k gets larger positively the energy gets larger negatively. | ||
We end up getting: | We end up getting: | ||
< | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here a specifies how quickly the slope for the first solution decays, and b deals with the depth of the potential well. | ||
+ | |||
+ | There may be 2 values for k, depending on the values of a and b. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If b<a, then there are two possibilities for k. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If b>a, then only one k exists. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is mainly determined by < | ||
+ | |||
+ | As in the discussion, we have two potentials for the finite well at points -a and a. When the energies for both potential are either positive or negative then the transition between the two barriers is stable creating the new slope for the region -a < x < a. | ||
+ | |||
+ | When one potential is positive and the other negative we have two decaying slopes that join at zero. When these two points are far apart then < | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, if those two points are to close together then the decaying slopes in the region of -a < x < a become exceedingly steep. Therefore, the resulting angle is smaller than < | ||
------------------------- | ------------------------- |