Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:lec_notes_1116 [2009/11/17 17:51] – kuehler | classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:lec_notes_1116 [2009/11/19 11:59] (current) – yk | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Nov 16 (Mon) ===== | + | ===== Nov 16 (Mon) Angular momentum with raising/ |
** Responsible party: Pluto 4ever, malmx026 | ** Responsible party: Pluto 4ever, malmx026 | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
====Comparison Between SHO and Angular Momentum==== | ====Comparison Between SHO and Angular Momentum==== | ||
- | In lecture, we just went over the basics of angular momentum and how it compared to the equations we previously learned for the simple harmonic oscillator (SHO). | + | In lecture, we just went over the basics of angular momentum and how it compared to the equations |
- | ===SHO:=== | + | ^ ^ SHO ^ Angluar momentum ^ |
+ | |The hamiltonian, | ||
+ | |We tried to factorize H by |< | ||
+ | |Call these terms| < | ||
+ | |factorization is not perfect so H is|< | ||
+ | |the extra factor in H is related to the commutator |< | ||
+ | |while they in turn come from |< | ||
+ | |meanwhile, these equation for the bottom rung state will be useful for other things |< | ||
+ | | |no top rung|< | ||
+ | | from above, we can figure out, for example, |< | ||
- | < | + | For the top rung, by definition, < |
- | + | For the bottom rung, < | |
- | no top rung | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | bottom | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ===Angular Momentum=== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | has a top rung, < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | bottom rung, < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |