Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
School of Physics and Astronomy Wiki
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_0911

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_0911 [2009/09/14 10:55] x500_dues0009classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_0911 [2009/09/18 13:11] (current) x500_vinc0053
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 A similar problem is seen in eq. 1.25 and 1.26 only without the factor of x. I dont know where the partial derivative of x goes from eq. 1.25 and 1.26. Again, what have i overlooked?  A similar problem is seen in eq. 1.25 and 1.26 only without the factor of x. I dont know where the partial derivative of x goes from eq. 1.25 and 1.26. Again, what have i overlooked? 
- 
  
 === Mercury 8:10 09/11/09 === === Mercury 8:10 09/11/09 ===
Line 59: Line 58:
  
 Going from Eq. 1.25 to 1.26: you integrate both sides of eq. 1.25 with respect to x. The integral of a partial derivative of something simply yields that something. Going from Eq. 1.25 to 1.26: you integrate both sides of eq. 1.25 with respect to x. The integral of a partial derivative of something simply yields that something.
 +===vinc0053 13:10 9/18===
 +I had similar difficulty, but with the proof on page 13 in general.  I assume Griffiths is skipping over simple steps, but I can't interpolate what they may be.  Could someone break down these steps Barney style?
 +
 ==== ralph 10:25 9/11/09 ==== ==== ralph 10:25 9/11/09 ====
 Is the probability density for a wave function the same as a probability density function (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_density_function)? Is the probability density for a wave function the same as a probability density function (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_density_function)?
classes/2009/fall/phys4101.001/q_a_0911.1252943755.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/09/14 10:55 by x500_dues0009