Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
School of Physics and Astronomy Wiki

User Tools

Trace:
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1021

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1021 [2009/10/23 08:15] – ludemanclasses:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1021 [2009/10/23 10:34] (current) – jbarthel
Line 19: Line 19:
 === Dark Helmet 10/22 === === Dark Helmet 10/22 ===
 Depending on your degree of sarcasm, i am either just as excited as you or much less excited than you. :) Depending on your degree of sarcasm, i am either just as excited as you or much less excited than you. :)
 +
 +===Captain America 10-23===
 +I'm pumped!
  
 ====Hydra==== ====Hydra====
Line 172: Line 175:
 ===Spherical=== ===Spherical===
 Maybe, as Griffiths says, I shoulda been a mathematician...  I realize he's not explicitly mentioning a delta function, it just sounds like what he refers to "could be" a delta function as well...  but ya.  It's just not. Is a delta function "square integrable"? -- Yes because it has an 'area' yes?   Maybe, as Griffiths says, I shoulda been a mathematician...  I realize he's not explicitly mentioning a delta function, it just sounds like what he refers to "could be" a delta function as well...  but ya.  It's just not. Is a delta function "square integrable"? -- Yes because it has an 'area' yes?  
 +
 +===liux0756===
 +The 'isolated points' the footnote related is talking about points with finite values. Of course delta function is not square integrable, because <math>\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta(x)^2 dx = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta(x) \delta(x) dx =\delta(0) = + \infty </math> (equation [2.113])
  
 ====Daniel Faraday 10/22 10:30pm==== ====Daniel Faraday 10/22 10:30pm====
Line 177: Line 183:
  
 ===Green Suit 10/23 8:00=== ===Green Suit 10/23 8:00===
-I think this is as simple as looking at the graph provided and looking for where the lines cross. For symmetric z= 2, 4 (approximately) with z=la then l= 2/a, 4/a. For asymmetric z= 3, 5 (approximately) then l= 3/a, 5/a.+I think this is as simple as looking at the graph provided and looking for where the lines cross. For symmetric z= 2, 4 (approximately) with z=la then l= 2/a, 4/a. For asymmetric z= 3, 5 (approximately) then l= 3/a, 5/a. I think. It's then up to you to figure out if those numbers are sensible.
  
 ====Sherical chicken==== ====Sherical chicken====
classes/2009/fall/phys4101.001/q_a_1021.1256303720.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/10/23 08:15 by ludeman

Page Tools