Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1030 [2009/11/03 20:28] – x500_kroh0054 | classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1030 [2009/11/30 16:32] (current) – youmans | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ===Blackbox 2:10 - 11/ | ===Blackbox 2:10 - 11/ | ||
| Yes, it' a kind of Fourier trick. If you look at the equation 2.144, then you would understand how this proof has been made. | Yes, it' a kind of Fourier trick. If you look at the equation 2.144, then you would understand how this proof has been made. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Can 10:48 11/06/09 === | ||
| + | For Chap < | ||
| ====ralph - 11:10AM 10/ | ====ralph - 11:10AM 10/ | ||
| Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
| What is a good method for finding the determinant of an nxn matrix? Do you think we will need to be able to find such a determinant in this class? Why or why not? | What is a good method for finding the determinant of an nxn matrix? Do you think we will need to be able to find such a determinant in this class? Why or why not? | ||
| + | ====Jake22 4:30 11/ | ||
| + | Must all non-degenerate energy eigenfunctions be parity eigenfunctions? | ||
| -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ||
| **Return to Q&A main page: [[Q_A]]**\\ | **Return to Q&A main page: [[Q_A]]**\\ | ||
| **Q&A for the previous lecture: [[Q_A_1028]]**\\ | **Q&A for the previous lecture: [[Q_A_1028]]**\\ | ||
| **Q&A for the next lecture: [[Q_A_1102]]** | **Q&A for the next lecture: [[Q_A_1102]]** | ||