Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1209 [2009/12/10 15:24] – yk
+++ classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1209 [2009/12/19 17:23] (current) – x500_sohnx020
@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 ===Yuichi===
 This is an elegant way to solve a problems for sure, but I don't think it is an efficient way to find the solution necessarily.   If you come across with such an operator, your life is easy, but if I were you, if this discovery does not happen, I would use more dumb but sure way, which may require finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors.  Once that's done, with the wisdom of hindsight, you may be able to find such an operator.  The right operator for 6.7 is not something you are very familiar with, and many of you may not think of it.
+====Jake22 12/15 4:30====
+What are some suggested alternatives to using 4.178 for describing a two level system (like one of states spin up and spin down) that may allow the two particle state to be expressed without entanglement, as in a composition of one-particle states?
+=== Blackbox 5:30 ===
+.178 shows only one state  with m=0 carries s=0 which is singlet case. I don't think there may exist other good alternatives for this espression.
 ---------------------------------------