Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1209 [2009/12/15 04:33] – youmans | classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1209 [2009/12/19 17:23] (current) – x500_sohnx020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| ====Jake22 12/15 4:30==== | ====Jake22 12/15 4:30==== | ||
| What are some suggested alternatives to using 4.178 for describing a two level system (like one of states spin up and spin down) that may allow the two particle state to be expressed without entanglement, | What are some suggested alternatives to using 4.178 for describing a two level system (like one of states spin up and spin down) that may allow the two particle state to be expressed without entanglement, | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Blackbox 5:30 === | ||
| + | 4.178 shows only one state with m=0 carries s=0 which is singlet case. I don't think there may exist other good alternatives for this espression. | ||
| --------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ||