Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1216 [2009/12/16 09:43] – x500_porte210 | classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1216 [2009/12/17 21:57] (current) – yk | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Hey there Can. I think all it was asking, in simple terms, was to see the effect on the Z component of angular momentum if you mess around with the x and y components... | Hey there Can. I think all it was asking, in simple terms, was to see the effect on the Z component of angular momentum if you mess around with the x and y components... | ||
+ | ===prest121 12/16 5:45pm=== | ||
+ | In HW problem 4.18, we were given this expression: | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | We wanted to solve for < | ||
- | ====John Galt 12/16==== | + | Eventually we got < |
- | If anyone who killed their tests sees this, would you mind bringing them to class today? I'm not sure if Yuichi is going to give us solutions to the previous exams, but they would be good review for the final. I could certainly use some help on test one and 3. | + | We can see that the solution of this can be < |
+ | < | ||
+ | If we used any of these other versions, our matrices for < | ||
+ | After all this, the question is whether or not this would change a certain fundamental QM relation of your choice. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====John Galt 12/16==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | If anyone who killed their tests sees this, would you mind bringing them to class today? I'm not sure if Yuichi is going to give us solutions to the previous exams, but they would be good review for the final. I could certainly use some help on test one and 3. | ||
+ | === Yuichi === | ||
+ | Solutions have been posted. Nevertheless, | ||
--------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- |