Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
School of Physics and Astronomy Wiki

User Tools


classes:2012:spring:phys1301w.200:home

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

classes:2012:spring:phys1301w.200:home [2012/01/16 00:31] – created ykclasses:2012:spring:phys1301w.200:home [2012/02/10 08:59] (current) yk
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== 1301W.200 wiki page ====== ====== 1301W.200 wiki page ======
 students, TAs and faculty instructors can post anything which are related to the class here. students, TAs and faculty instructors can post anything which are related to the class here.
 +
 +===== Study resources =====
 +
 +==== Here is a contribution from a student ====
 +
 +The first one, Khanacademy.org is just a website built by a guy who
 +received 3 different degrees from MIT, and then an MBA from Harvard.
 +He's made several thousand videos over the past few years that cover
 +everything from corporate finance, to biology, chemistry, organic
 +chemistry,  trigonometry, calculus, linear algebra (and just about
 +every other level of math there is), art history, astronomy, and of
 +course physics.  And those cover a pretty full range of topics from
 +kinematics, projectile motion, fluids, circuits, thermodynamics, etc.
 +Videos average about just 10 minutes, but will push up to 25-30
 +minutes for more complicated subjects like linear algebra.  It seems
 +to me that the guy just has a natural talent for communicating.
 +Calculus for example is not hard to learn, but unfortunately for the
 +instructors, it's hard to teach because of how obscure many of the
 +concepts can be when first presented.  I've noticed that most people
 +feel that once you finally understand what the calculus teacher is
 +trying to convey, it's suddenly so easy that it's more tedious than
 +anything, and you feel like an idiot for not grasping it sooner.
 +Case in point, on almost every video I've watched of calculus I see
 +comments at the bottom from kids in like the 7th grade, even one made
 +by a 12 year old, who were watching the videos and grasping, with
 +ease, the same concepts that so many of my university peers in the 8am
 +calc class are having to work at.  And if nothing else, it's great
 +remedial education for those who are out of practice and need a
 +refresher.
 +
 +The second, physics-online.com, just has a wide array of interactive
 +modules that seem to cover almost every subject in basic physics.  And
 +as I said before, at least for me, it's the simple act of repetition
 +that does it.  Often times, just by doing something I can learn it
 +even if I've never had any formal education and lack any prior
 +knowledge.  But the real value, especially given that the FREE
 +lite-version (which gives you everything you need anyway), is in the
 +visualization.  Looking at a collection of letters and Greek symbols
 +pieced together into a formula on a chalk board is much harder to
 +interpret and internalized than the picture of a cannon shooting a
 +ball at an initial velocity any angle you choose, while plotting the
 +trajectory in flight and showing you how the vectors change.  So what
 +I do is just click and set random values without looking at the screen
 +and then based on how far it went or the angle I set, or whatever
 +variable I decide to play with, I try to see if I can calculate the
 +remaining variables.
 +
 +But another thing that I thought you might be interested is one of its
 +features called "Mechanics Pad" It's an interactive module where you
 +can literally design your own mechanical system with pulleys, gears,
 +levers, vectors, or it seems just about any other mechanical system
 +you can imagine.  I've yet to really explore it, but it seems like
 +that could probably be useful for something.
classes/2012/spring/phys1301w.200/home.1326695504.txt.gz · Last modified: 2012/01/16 00:31 (external edit)