Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
School of Physics and Astronomy Wiki

User Tools


graduate_handbook:ta_expectations:performance_evaluation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
graduate_handbook:ta_expectations:performance_evaluation [2024/11/05 08:39] vinalsgraduate_handbook:ta_expectations:performance_evaluation [2024/11/05 08:56] (current) vinals
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Performance and Evaluation ====== ====== Performance and Evaluation ======
  
-  * __Satisfactory performance of teaching duties__  Performance in this category will be assessed by he Director of Undergraduate Studies with input from the corresponding instructor of record. See also [[graduate_handbook:ta_expectations:appendix_a/satisfactory_performance_of_teaching_duties|Appendix]]+==== Satisfactory performance of teaching duties ====
  
 +Performance in this category will be assessed by the Director of Undergraduate Studies with input from the corresponding instructor of record.
  
-  * __Satisfactory progress toward a graduate degree__ Once annually (typically in May) the student must submit an "Annual Review of Progress" online. The report needs to be approved by the adviser of record, and by the Director of Graduate StudiesWith their concurrence, the student will be deemed to be "making satisfactory progress toward the degree". See also [[:graduate_handbook:physics_graduate_policies#requirements_for_satisfactory_progress_in_the_graduate_program|Requirements for satisfactory progress in the graduate program]]+The task of teaching large numbers of students is one which requires the coordinated efforts of many people; the lecturerthe laboratory and discussion instructors, technicians, the students, and several othersAs members of this group, the Teaching Assistants should cooperate with the others in the teaching process and in its evaluation, review and improvement. By doing so, they will contribute to their own development as well as to the effective functioning of the Physics program and the University of Minnesota.
  
-School policy also requires that students beyond one year from the Oral exam that request TA support need to convene their oral committee at least once a year, and make a presentation about their research progress+The evaluation will be based on performance in [[graduate_handbook:ta_expectations:appendix_a:description_of_specific_duties|the duties assigned as described]], and the results of the end of semester SRT (Student Rating of Teaching) instrument administered for each class. 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +==== Satisfactory progress toward a graduate degree ==== 
 +Once annually (typically in May) the student must submit an "Annual Review of Progress" online. The report needs to be approved by the adviser of record, and by the Director of Graduate Studies. With their concurrence, the student will be deemed to be "making satisfactory progress toward the degree". See also [[:graduate_handbook:physics_graduate_policies#requirements_for_satisfactory_progress_in_the_graduate_program|Requirements for satisfactory progress in the graduate program]]. 
 + 
 +School policy also requires that students beyond one year from the Oral exam that request TA support need to convene their oral committee at least once a year, and make a presentation about their research progress ([[:graduate_handbook:physics_graduate_policies#requirements_for_satisfactory_progress_in_the_graduate_program|Requirements for satisfactory progress in the graduate program]] 
 +).
  
  
  
graduate_handbook/ta_expectations/performance_evaluation.1730817586.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/11/05 08:39 by vinals