Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
groups:homestake:agenda [2015/10/25 13:28] – mandic | groups:homestake:agenda [2015/12/11 14:57] (current) – mandic | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Agenda: | Agenda: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{groups: | ||
Friday, 10/23 | Friday, 10/23 | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
Saturday, 10/24 | Saturday, 10/24 | ||
- | - Goals with Homestake data (Victor) | + | - Goals with Homestake data (Victor): {{groups: |
- Brief overview from Gary: {{groups: | - Brief overview from Gary: {{groups: | ||
- Gary has some analysis code under development to show. These are tools to visualize and measure three-component particle motions. | - Gary has some analysis code under development to show. These are tools to visualize and measure three-component particle motions. | ||
Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
- may be able to measure body waves directly with underground stations? | - may be able to measure body waves directly with underground stations? | ||
- Could potentially detect the presence of Love waves. | - Could potentially detect the presence of Love waves. | ||
+ | - Attempt to compare the noise correlation functions (pseudo-Green' | ||
+ | - test various pre-processing techniques to maximize signal recovery. This may be of relevance for radiometer signal pre-processing too. | ||
- How does this extend to isotropic GW background? Can you measure the speed of gravitational waves? (Vuk, ...) | - How does this extend to isotropic GW background? Can you measure the speed of gravitational waves? (Vuk, ...) | ||
- Visualization of the motion (Gary) | - Visualization of the motion (Gary) | ||
Line 56: | Line 60: | ||
- how well does the subtraction work at different depth, different frequencies, | - how well does the subtraction work at different depth, different frequencies, | ||
- how do we determine the optimal array design? Test performance of the filtering after dropping some of the stations | - how do we determine the optimal array design? Test performance of the filtering after dropping some of the stations | ||
+ | - Question: is it possible to use the spatial patterns of signal coherence (or some other misfit metric) to map regions of higher scattering or anisotropy, and/or to determine a weighting scheme for a radiometer or beamforming code? | ||
- Related to Wiener: how do we measure correlations in an inhomogeneous seismic field? That is, how do we measure/ | - Related to Wiener: how do we measure correlations in an inhomogeneous seismic field? That is, how do we measure/ | ||
- Use the deep EQ in Japan to estimate the incident and reflected waves, subtract them from data and the residual should carry information about the local scattering... | - Use the deep EQ in Japan to estimate the incident and reflected waves, subtract them from data and the residual should carry information about the local scattering... |