Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
School of Physics and Astronomy Wiki

User Tools


groups:homestake:meetings:20140626

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
groups:homestake:meetings:20140626 [2014/06/26 10:57] mandicgroups:homestake:meetings:20140626 [2014/06/26 10:59] (current) mandic
Line 21: Line 21:
 3) Analysis of existing data 3) Analysis of existing data
  
-    - Noah: trying to understand whether aliasing can be reduced by integrating over different frequencies or over longer time periods. Posted a  {{groups:homestake:meetings:temporarypowerpoint.pdf|report}}. Observe that the checkerboard pattern coalesces with averaging, but the results in general are not as good as in cases where there is no aliasing.+Noah: trying to understand whether aliasing can be reduced by integrating over different frequencies or over longer time periods. Posted a  {{groups:homestake:meetings:temporarypowerpoint.pdf|report}}. Observe that the checkerboard pattern coalesces with averaging, but the results in general are not as good as in cases where there is no aliasing.
  
 Victor: try to average over longer time periods, maybe of order 1 day. Victor: try to average over longer time periods, maybe of order 1 day.
Line 27: Line 27:
 Vuk: try to average instead of integrating over different frequencies/times. Vuk: try to average instead of integrating over different frequencies/times.
  
-    - Vuk updated the directional analysis note: {{groups:homestake:analysis:directional_analysis_v2.pdf|pdf}}. The note now includes the calculation for Rayleigh waves, following the discussion between Victor, Eric, and Vuk at Caltech several days ago. Results are similar to P-waves, with the distinction that there is an exponentially decaying factor (with depth) and a different coupling of the wave to the seismometers' channels. +Vuk updated the directional analysis note: {{groups:homestake:analysis:directional_analysis_v2.pdf|pdf}}. The note now includes the calculation for Rayleigh waves, following the discussion between Victor, Eric, and Vuk at Caltech several days ago. Results are similar to P-waves, with the distinction that there is an exponentially decaying factor (with depth) and a different coupling of the wave to the seismometers' channels.  
 + 
 +Vuk/Victor: plan to have multiple tools that we could use to look at the data. Rayleigh waves will dominate at least the shallower part of the array at Homestake, so it will be useful to apply such a tool to understand what component of the data could be explained with the Rayleigh model.  
 + 
 +Next meeting: 7/24. 
groups/homestake/meetings/20140626.1403798223.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/06/26 10:57 by mandic