Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- groups:homestake:meetings:20160505 [2016/05/05 10:42] – mandic
+++ groups:homestake:meetings:20160505 [2016/05/05 11:02] (current) – mandic
@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
   * data analysis updates
     * Rayleigh waves [[https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/_media/groups/homestake/meetings/2016_05_04_rayleigh_waves.pdf]]
+      * Victor: Rayleigh and Love waves come roughly at the same time, so this may complicate the recovery. Could try to separate them in time since they travel at different speeds.
+      * Tanner: for nearby events it would be harder to separate Rayleigh and Love.
+      * Victor: yes, but also you lose high-frequency part of the signal from very distant events.
+      * Victor: the noise field probably also have significant Love waves (SH waves), may have to model this too. In the microseism, we expect the Rayleigh to be stronger, at higher frequencies this might not be true.
+      * Ross: do_mft program, part of the computer programs for seismology:  http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqccps.html. Useful for this kind of studies.
+    * Victor: there will be a couple of students processing the active source data, one at Boise state and one visiting student at Caltech.