Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| people:walstrom:distance [2009/08/28 17:43] – walstrom | people:walstrom:distance [2009/08/28 17:49] (current) – walstrom | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| This plot shows the |h| values of the total supercluster collection from reconstruction in ECAL. For pile up 2 There is a fairly constant value of superclusters across eta, the high eta range still contains more due to the pile up 2 effect. For pile up 20 and 40 the shape of the distribution of the superclusters across |h| changes drastically. The trend fits a constant within the barrel abs(|h|) < 1.48. There is a nontrivial peak at the outer edge of the endcap and another peak at the inner edge of the endcap at high values of |h|. Due to no obvious physical reason why there would be more pile up superclusters in those regions it is hypothysised to be an over correction from reco in CMSSW. Partly constructed superclusters and shifted to the first detectable |h| value in the endcap. Across the endcap the number of superclusers trends upward with increasing abs(|h|). | This plot shows the |h| values of the total supercluster collection from reconstruction in ECAL. For pile up 2 There is a fairly constant value of superclusters across eta, the high eta range still contains more due to the pile up 2 effect. For pile up 20 and 40 the shape of the distribution of the superclusters across |h| changes drastically. The trend fits a constant within the barrel abs(|h|) < 1.48. There is a nontrivial peak at the outer edge of the endcap and another peak at the inner edge of the endcap at high values of |h|. Due to no obvious physical reason why there would be more pile up superclusters in those regions it is hypothysised to be an over correction from reco in CMSSW. Partly constructed superclusters and shifted to the first detectable |h| value in the endcap. Across the endcap the number of superclusers trends upward with increasing abs(|h|). | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| + | This plot shows the d|h| value that is taken from the matching algorithm. This is done to check if the specific d|h| or dphi has a different shape than the calculated dR value. The peak and trend shown here is the same pattern seen in the dR plot. the d|h| does not appear to display any different behavior from the behavior of the dR value. | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| + | This plot shows the dphi value from the matching algorithm. It again appears to have the same trends as the dR data. Pile up appears to effect dphi just as it effects the total dR value. | ||