Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- people:walstrom:yield [2009/08/31 15:42] – walstrom
+++ people:walstrom:yield [2009/10/03 15:47] (current) – walstrom
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{:groups:cms:walstrom:yield2_100_425.gif|}}\\
-This plot takes the yield from the fit of the histogram. For this plot yield is calculated as the number of events under the measured mass peak devided by the number of events in the histogram. The arching behavior could be a sum of several different trends. I hypothese that when the mass peak widens that it more easily catches the edges of the peak and includes more events causing the yield to increase as a function of pile up. The more obvious effect being that as pile up increases there is a larger number of misreconstuctions that calculate the invariant mass at close to zero, thus causing yield to decrease as a function of pile up.
+{{:groups:cms:walstrom:mass_eff_bc_425.gif|}}
-{{:groups:cms:walstrom:2_80_yield_2000.gif|}}\\
+{{:groups:cms:walstrom:mass_eff_sc_425.gif|}}
-This shows the same technique used for the mass = 2000 GeV simulation. This appears as though pile up has no effect on yield. These reconstructed invariant masses has larger intrinsic widths, otherwise I am still trying to explain this difference in behavior.
-{{:groups:cms:walstrom:yield2_100_425_10000.gif|}}\\
-{{:groups:cms:walstrom:2_80_yield_2000_10000.gif|}}
+{{:groups:cms:walstrom:mass_eff_bc_2000.gif|}}
+{{:groups:cms:walstrom:mass_eff_sc_2000.gif|}}