Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| 20180914_decorr [2018/09/14 15:20] – pryke | 20180914_decorr [2018/09/14 15:22] (current) – pryke | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| In this post I look at the decorrelation of the dust and sync patterns by comparing cross-spectra to the | In this post I look at the decorrelation of the dust and sync patterns by comparing cross-spectra to the | ||
| geometric mean of auto-spectra (the lower right panel of each plot). | geometric mean of auto-spectra (the lower right panel of each plot). | ||
| - | We see that only the 98 and 99 (multi-layer and Vansyngel) models are significantly decorrelated in dust. | + | We see that only the 98 and 99 (multi-layer and Vansyngel) models are significantly decorrelated in dust, |
| + | and none of them are significantly decorrelated in sync. | ||
| I take the power spectra using anafast and the soft edge mask shown below. | I take the power spectra using anafast and the soft edge mask shown below. | ||