Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki
20181025_aps_gnilc_m91-92-92a0p15_comb

Band Power Spectra and Parameters estimated from cleaned CMB maps

G. Rocha, 2018 September 19th


We report here the Band Power Spectra and parameters estimated for the component separation methods applied to Simulated data. For each method we estimate the full sky band power spectra with Xfaster, propagate to parameters with a Gaussian correlated Likelihood, and sample parameters with CosmoMC, marginalizing over tailored foreground residual templates. In addition we consider a hybrid likelihood: BFlike (pixel based likelihood) at low-l and XFlike (Xfaster likelihood) at high-l.

red|Updates (on November 22nd, 2018)
In this post we present results for GNILC, Model 91, 92, 92A0p15, fsky98

Band Power Spectra

GNILC

Model 91, 92 and 92A0p15 vs input lensedCls

Band Powers (BP) and uncertainties for GNILC BB map, model 91, 92 and 92A0p15 (first panel).
Also shown are the residuals of the estimated BP and the input spectra (ffp10_lensedCls.dat) used to simulate the input maps (second panel).
The BP was estimated with XFpipe.

Band Power Spectra, Uncertainties and Residuals


BB - lmax=50 BB - lmax=200
BB - lmax=1000

Model 91, 92 and 92A0p15 vs input tensorCls

Band Powers (BP) and uncertainties for GNILC BB map, model 91, 92 and 92A0p15 (first panel).
Also shown are the residuals of the estimated BP and the input spectra (ffp10_wtensors_tensCls.dat) used to simulate the input maps (second panel).
The BP was estimated with XFpipe.

Band Power Spectra, Uncertainties and Residuals


BB - lmax=50 BB - lmax=200
BB - lmax=200 BB - lmax=1000

Comparison

**BB
20181025_aps_gnilc_m91-92-92a0p15_comb.txt · Last modified: 2018/11/22 10:04 by grocha