Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| beams_and_cl_1 [2018/07/16 09:13] – hivon | beams_and_cl_1 [2018/07/16 09:25] (current) – hivon | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| --- // | --- // | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[systematicswg|Back to Systematics WG]] | ||
| === 2018/07/16 === | === 2018/07/16 === | ||
| - | The beam computed at 150GHz, at a location offset by 10cm in the X (=co-scan) direction is now also available, on top of the central beam and Y=10cm beams generated earlier this month. | + | The beam computed at 150GHz, at a location offset by 10cm in the X (=co-scan) direction is now also available, on top of the central beam and Y=10cm beams generated earlier this month.\\ |
| {{: | {{: | ||
| Two different effects are now visible on the power spectra: | Two different effects are now visible on the power spectra: | ||
| - | * an overall rotation of the polarization by ~1.73 deg, showing up as a strong EE to BB leakage when the full IQU beam is used instead of assuming a copolar beam (something we did **not** see in the (X,Y)=(0,0) and (0,10cm) cases) | + | * an overall rotation of the polarization by 1.74 deg, showing up as a strong EE to BB leakage when the full IQU beam is used instead of assuming a copolar beam (something we did **not** see in the (X,Y)=(0,0) and (0,10cm) cases) |
| * the ell-dependent leakage from EE to BB seen previously is now larger than before. | * the ell-dependent leakage from EE to BB seen previously is now larger than before. | ||