Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| private:teleconsnotes20170920 [2017/09/20 15:59] – lknox | private:teleconsnotes20170920 [2017/09/27 14:47] (current) – hanany | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Telecon Notes 20170920 ====== | ====== Telecon Notes 20170920 ====== | ||
| - | Attendance: | + | Attendance: |
| - | Notes by: \\ | + | Notes by: |
| === Agenda === | === Agenda === | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| === Notes ==== | === Notes ==== | ||
| - | * Taken by Lloyd | + | |
| * Foreground workshop dates are set to be Nov 29 to Dec 1. Location is UCSD. | * Foreground workshop dates are set to be Nov 29 to Dec 1. Location is UCSD. | ||
| * Science and complementarity workshop: JC proposed to keep S4 separate from an April/May Probe and decadal panel meeting. And have S4 in week of March 5 to 9. SH says that could work if we have a day or day and a half for complementarity. JC and S4 are going ahead looking at a 2-day or 2.5 day workshop, really focused on governance. JC still prefers a two separate workshop solution. Julian points out benefits to having these two workshops right next to each other, with some overlap. Chair selected by end of 2018. Julian and Lloyd to discuss at CMB-S4 ICCC meeting next week and report back. | * Science and complementarity workshop: JC proposed to keep S4 separate from an April/May Probe and decadal panel meeting. And have S4 in week of March 5 to 9. SH says that could work if we have a day or day and a half for complementarity. JC and S4 are going ahead looking at a 2-day or 2.5 day workshop, really focused on governance. JC still prefers a two separate workshop solution. Julian points out benefits to having these two workshops right next to each other, with some overlap. Chair selected by end of 2018. Julian and Lloyd to discuss at CMB-S4 ICCC meeting next week and report back. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| * SH: yes. Let's take side lobes. Is it a fundamental limitation for us? I dont' know. But we do want in the end to say "1/f, beam mismatch that can be potentially be dealt with with wave plate or scan strategy, we have checked and we can deal with them." But SH is worried side lobes are too hard to deal with. BC: maybe we can think of clever ways to place constraints. AT: There are already several things listed in this table that should be impacting our design, adn the way we are prioritizing effort on the design. | * SH: yes. Let's take side lobes. Is it a fundamental limitation for us? I dont' know. But we do want in the end to say "1/f, beam mismatch that can be potentially be dealt with with wave plate or scan strategy, we have checked and we can deal with them." But SH is worried side lobes are too hard to deal with. BC: maybe we can think of clever ways to place constraints. AT: There are already several things listed in this table that should be impacting our design, adn the way we are prioritizing effort on the design. | ||
| * SH: when table is complete, come back to the EC with suggestions of what to work on more. BC: I hope that will happen in two weeks. We report to EC. | * SH: when table is complete, come back to the EC with suggestions of what to work on more. BC: I hope that will happen in two weeks. We report to EC. | ||
| + | * Data challenge: Shaul, Lloyd, Julian to touch base off line about how DC and FG workshop, and all ties together. | ||