Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools

Trace:
private:teleconsnotes20180801

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
private:teleconsnotes20180801 [2018/08/07 17:21] – hananyprivate:teleconsnotes20180801 [2018/08/07 17:32] (current) – hanany
Line 18: Line 18:
  
  
-coordination with S4 and rest of community about report:+__Coordination with S4 and rest of community about report:__
   * There are three products: 1) Science white paper (SWP) for decadal panel; 2) report for PICO, due Dec; 3) S4 is writing project book   * There are three products: 1) Science white paper (SWP) for decadal panel; 2) report for PICO, due Dec; 3) S4 is writing project book
   * SH agreed with Lloyd: SWP should be formally independent from projects. Lloyd has started putting stuff into a wiki page only for SWP, 2 days ago.   * SH agreed with Lloyd: SWP should be formally independent from projects. Lloyd has started putting stuff into a wiki page only for SWP, 2 days ago.
-  * Galactic science white paper?  +  * Galactic science white paper? Dave: we are still in the process of determining what should be in the report. Shaul: there might be broader range of people who are interested in this; Dave: will talk to Laura to determine who to reach out to.  
 +  * Charles: CMB-S4 is also preparing white paper for decal survey, there would be overlap; Shaul: CMB-S4 is preparing project papers, not SWP. They have a 'Science Section' in their project paper, but that will not be submitted as SWP. 
  
-Dave: we are still in the process of determining what should be in 
  
-Shaul: there might be broader range of people who are interested in this 
  
-Charles: CMB-S4 is also preparing white paper for decal survey, there would be overlap+__Requirement vs current best estimate:__
  
-Shaul: CMB-S4 is preparing an augment, not planning to submit an independent site. +There is now fairly high confidence on the temperatures of mirrors and stop, so can finalize current best estimate (CBE) and requirements. CBE = 0.61 uK*arcmin; and Requirement = 0.86 uK*arcmin. Excel sheets and information on the wiki now updated. 
- +
-documents for next year, Dec. 2018 to Dec. 2019.  +
- +
-Charles:  +
- +
-Shaul: complementary paper was thought to be (with Julian) submitted with project paper, not with science paper. +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
-Requirement vs current best estimate +
- +
- +
-thermal requirement and thermal loads +
- +
-Temperatures of mirrors and stop: high confidence now. +
- +
- +
-excel sheets, current best estimate 0.61, slightly better than 0.65 reported in SPIE paper, requirement 0.85 +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
-draft report +
- +
- +
-outline, Shaul wants to go through, 1 month to produce texts +
- +
-Sec 2.1, Shaul is committed to write 1.5 pages in a week or two +
- +
-Dan: we agreed to work on 2.1 with Raphael +
- +
-Raphael: no obstruction +
- +
- +
-The bullets are from STM, science trace matrix +
- +
- +
-Shaul: it would be unfortunate if PICO can do some science but we don’t highlight +
- +
- +
-(Ai) 2.1 and 2.2.1 in Two weeks +
- +
-Shaul: by the end of Augst, we need a draft +
- +
-2.2.1 and 2.2.2, three weeks from now, leave one week for EC summary  +
- +
- +
- +
-signal/noise +
- +
-use updated numbers +
- +
- +
-STM are based on requirement +
- +
-Run with both numbers +
- +
- +
-Writing texts in three weeks +
- +
-what are the key figures going in, and how we want to improve them +
- +
- +
-text in place in 3 weeks. Forecasts could be later. Dave: we are still deciding what the key figures are within 3 pages with 5 topics.  +
- +
- +
- +
-2.4 +
- +
-Shaul: Douglas  +
- +
-Nick: 2 pages for “additional science”, now it’s 4 pages, needs to be trimmed; leave half page for other stuff, maybe 2 or 3 more communities; my stuff does not need half of page, can be short. +
- +
-Shaul to send email to ?? talking about trimming down. +
- +
- +
-Shaul: flip 2.4, 2.5 before 2.3? move 2.3 after foreground and systematics? +
- +
-Amy:  +
- +
- +
- +
-2.5. complementary  +
- +
-Charles did  +
- +
-Marshar Smithful?? during WorkShop, data with other data sets, Charles will contact him (AI) +
- +
- +
- +
- +
-Instrument and mission (Amy) +
- +
-JPL challenge, we have a schedule  +
- +
-Instrument is , the mission a page of telescope, total page: 7 +
- +
-we have some draft content for spacecraft +
- +
- +
- +
-Ch6, by the end of this month +
- +
- +
-Shaul:  +
- +
-Amy: JPL based template, like other Probes, happy to work on it to shrink pages.+
  
 +__Draft Report__
  
 +  * Dan+Raphael agree we agreed to work on 2.1
 +  * **Plan is for everyone to submit text within 3 weeks, Aug. 22. This gives Dan+Raphael + SH another week to write the introduction.** 
 +  * Should we stick to the STM or write broadly? Cover everything in the STM, and then add some more. 
 +  * Shaul: how about flipping 2.4, 2.5 before 2.3? 
 +  * Charles knows that he is responsible for 'Complementarity'. Shaul: should we contact Marcel Schmidtful? 
 +  * Amy reviews JPL contributions. 
 +  * Amy will get the machinery going in JPL to support Tim Pearson
private/teleconsnotes20180801.1533680512.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/08/07 17:21 by hanany

Page Tools