Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
private:teleconsnotes20181219 [2018/12/19 15:39] – kyoung | private:teleconsnotes20181219 [2018/12/20 15:54] (current) – hanany | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Telecon Notes Dec. 19, 2018 ====== | ====== Telecon Notes Dec. 19, 2018 ====== | ||
- | Attendance: | + | Attendance: |
Notes by: Karl \\ | Notes by: Karl \\ | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* From now on, limited *and coordinated* editing, please. | * From now on, limited *and coordinated* editing, please. | ||
* Authorships/ | * Authorships/ | ||
- | * Status of writing {{:private:picoreport_20181219.pdf|Current | + | * Status of writing {{:private:picoreport.pdf|current |
* Executive Summary in progress | * Executive Summary in progress | ||
* Introduction will be replaced with ' | * Introduction will be replaced with ' | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* SO (and S4 source counts) | * SO (and S4 source counts) | ||
* Foregrounds - Needs review (SH) but Interesting Progress from Mathieu | * Foregrounds - Needs review (SH) but Interesting Progress from Mathieu | ||
+ | * Mathieu plot: {{: | ||
* Systematics - Done | * Systematics - Done | ||
* Requirements - Needs review (SH) | * Requirements - Needs review (SH) | ||
Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
* Exploring our history, from the Big Bang to the Milky Way | * Exploring our history, from the Big Bang to the Milky Way | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Telecon Notes Dec. 19, 2018 ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Attendance: | ||
- | |||
- | Notes by: Karl \\ | ||
=== Notes === | === Notes === | ||
Line 65: | Line 59: | ||
* give general definitions like EE, BB, CBE, Baseline etc. Talks about comparisons to things like S3 and SO. | * give general definitions like EE, BB, CBE, Baseline etc. Talks about comparisons to things like S3 and SO. | ||
* Idea is to give the reader the background they need. | * Idea is to give the reader the background they need. | ||
- | * JB: Is S4 comparison discussed? | + | * JB: Is S4 comparison discussed? |
* AT: May consider introducing what the subsections of Chapt 2 are. Some guidance to readers. | * AT: May consider introducing what the subsections of Chapt 2 are. Some guidance to readers. | ||
* SH: Good idea. **Will work on this** | * SH: Good idea. **Will work on this** | ||
Line 77: | Line 71: | ||
* JB: Should only include things that are significant improvements. | * JB: Should only include things that are significant improvements. | ||
* JD: But these small things add up. Maybe each of these factors of 2 are put together in one section. | * JD: But these small things add up. Maybe each of these factors of 2 are put together in one section. | ||
- | * | + | * CL: We should discuss what PICO can do. Our predictions. Not talk about what others did or think they can do or may have done wrong. |
* Other 95% complete - but DM improvements (including axions) relative to Simons are ~x2. Include? | * Other 95% complete - but DM improvements (including axions) relative to Simons are ~x2. Include? | ||
+ | * This may move into a paragraph with LCDM extensions and other marginal improvements over Planck, SO, etc. | ||
* Other - OK | * Other - OK | ||
* Extragalactic | * Extragalactic | ||
* 'First Luminous Source' | * 'First Luminous Source' | ||
* Other (lensing, halo lensing, compton-Y) being rearranged - text tomorrow noon Central? | * Other (lensing, halo lensing, compton-Y) being rearranged - text tomorrow noon Central? | ||
+ | * Colin uploaded a new version today. | ||
* Galactic - 100% | * Galactic - 100% | ||
* Legacy - 98% complete. | * Legacy - 98% complete. | ||
* Table 2.3 is a question enlarge or delete? | * Table 2.3 is a question enlarge or delete? | ||
+ | * This material (and more) is in the text. Table is not exhaustive. | ||
+ | * JD: Mentioned CIB. We could say CIB is/can be involved in delensing. | ||
+ | * SH: This is a good example. | ||
+ | * JD: ** Will check if I can add information on CIB ** give update tonight if not. | ||
* SO (and S4 source counts) | * SO (and S4 source counts) | ||
+ | * Our calculations for what SO/S4 can do don't agree with their predictions. SO predicts many more sources than we predict. | ||
+ | * Example: We predict 50,000 clusters found. SO predicts many more than we expect they would when scaling from Planck. Gianfranco could resolve by communication with SO. | ||
* Foregrounds - Needs review (SH) but Interesting Progress from Mathieu | * Foregrounds - Needs review (SH) but Interesting Progress from Mathieu | ||
- | * Mathieu plot: {{: | + | * GNILC removal on 50% of sky. input r = 0. Dot line at r = 10^-4. |
* Systematics - Done | * Systematics - Done | ||
* Requirements - Needs review (SH) | * Requirements - Needs review (SH) | ||
Line 94: | Line 96: | ||
Cover page | Cover page | ||
- | * Samples: {{:private: | + | * Most people prefer top left figure. |
+ | * AT: these updates don't have new ideas from EC members. | ||
+ | * AT: None of these are final. | ||
+ | * AT: Just a comment. Having text on the cover is uncommon. | ||
+ | * JB: No text on cover isn't hard rule. Like the one with line of science points. Scattered science topics is just cluttered. | ||
+ | * SH: One concern was if the text on cover is obviously science goals. | ||
+ | * JB/JD: as long as the same language is in EC they will get it. | ||
+ | * JB: Like version 1 because it shows spacecraft. Like version | ||
+ | * JD: Don't like science topics scattered around. Keeping the line is better. No inflation in science topics? | ||
+ | * SH: my task to rewrite topics. Anyone want that task? . . . no response . . . | ||
+ | * AT: imagining 2 new versions. | ||
Parameter Constraints | Parameter Constraints | ||
Line 101: | Line 113: | ||
* SH: Maybe we put all the factor of 2's like n_s, n_run. | * SH: Maybe we put all the factor of 2's like n_s, n_run. | ||
* AvE: Important to distinguish between completed experiments (Planck) and planned experiments (SO or S4). Need to do much better than Planck, but marginally better than SO is more defensible. | * AvE: Important to distinguish between completed experiments (Planck) and planned experiments (SO or S4). Need to do much better than Planck, but marginally better than SO is more defensible. | ||
+ | * SH: Jacques, can you write a paragraph on a broad view of this? JD: **Yes, will do as soon as possible** | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||