Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki
systematicswg:telecons:2017-12-13:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
systematicswg:telecons:2017-12-13:start [2017/12/13 11:14] bcrillsystematicswg:telecons:2017-12-13:start [2017/12/13 11:51] (current) bcrill
Line 5: Line 5:
   * Julian: simulation efforts almost underway.  Massive CMB-S4 sim underway for next week: Berkeley group will have almost all of Cori for a couple of days.  In principle, if all goes well, and a PICO focal plane definition is available, can piggyback 12500 detectors for ~4 years with noise maps.   * Julian: simulation efforts almost underway.  Massive CMB-S4 sim underway for next week: Berkeley group will have almost all of Cori for a couple of days.  In principle, if all goes well, and a PICO focal plane definition is available, can piggyback 12500 detectors for ~4 years with noise maps.
  
-  * Systematics could later be simulated +  * Systematics could later be simulated, and probably don't all require full mission/full focal plane. 
-  * Zonca has on-the-fly bandpass mismatch tool integrated+  * note that Andrea Zonca has on-the-fly bandpass mismatch tool integrated.
-  * 4pi beam +
-  * Mis-calibration.+
  
-  * What does Julian need from Shaul: A Focal plane definition is the main thing.  should be sorted out TODAY at EC.+  * What does Julian need from Shaul: A Focal plane definition is the main thing.  should be sorted out today at EC.  He'll also check in on noise spectrum definition.
  
   * Foreground workshop from 2 weeks ago looked at sky models   * Foreground workshop from 2 weeks ago looked at sky models
   * Foreground realisations in the first instance will be convolved and added to the noise models, skipping time series.   * Foreground realisations in the first instance will be convolved and added to the noise models, skipping time series.
 +
 +  * Maurizio to update analysis he did for CORE by looking at S/N and time scales over which dipole signal varies min/max.  Mid-January is LSPC review doc deadline, so he should be able to look at this for PICO as soon as he's done with that. THANK YOU, Maurizio.
 +
 +  * Brendan to follow up again with Brad to try to get an update on GRASP sim scope/timescale
 + 
 +  * Next week, we'll have a discussion with the Cantabria group about their cubesat calibrator concept.
 +
  
systematicswg/telecons/2017-12-13/start.1513185244.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/12/13 11:14 by bcrill