Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-18:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-18:start [2018/04/18 12:00] bcrillsystematicswg:telecons:2018-04-18:start [2018/04/18 12:08] (current) bcrill
Line 20: Line 20:
        * DaCapo run on 2-year mission for 1 detector: calibrating in 6 hour signal chunks.  Error is 1%, calibration is biased by 0.6% by the Galaxy.  Maurizio changing sky masks: these jobs are submitted.        * DaCapo run on 2-year mission for 1 detector: calibrating in 6 hour signal chunks.  Error is 1%, calibration is biased by 0.6% by the Galaxy.  Maurizio changing sky masks: these jobs are submitted.
        * Maurizio would like to do naive component separation, i.e. be a little bit fancier than masking the sky.        * Maurizio would like to do naive component separation, i.e. be a little bit fancier than masking the sky.
-       * noise: white + 1/f noise (as described in the [[https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/optimizingscanstrategy/start|optimizing scan strategy]]), but DaCapo implements destriping.+       * noise: white + 1/f noise (as described in the [[https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/optimizingscanstrategy/start|optimizing scan strategy]] and the [[https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/baseline|baseline imager definition]]), but DaCapo implements destriping.
        * input sky: using pysm at 90 GHz. no kinetic dipole.        * input sky: using pysm at 90 GHz. no kinetic dipole.
        * What is the actual deliverable here?  These results set limits on how well dipole calibration on short time scales can mitigate systematic errors: perhaps revisit the systematics list in light of these results to see which are actually mitigated.        * What is the actual deliverable here?  These results set limits on how well dipole calibration on short time scales can mitigate systematic errors: perhaps revisit the systematics list in light of these results to see which are actually mitigated.
        * Correlated noise post re-calibration        * Correlated noise post re-calibration
 +   * next week: 
  
systematicswg/telecons/2018-04-18/start.1524070846.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/04/18 12:00 by bcrill