Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| aaac:questions:1s [2014/09/11 15:14] – prisca | aaac:questions:1s [2014/09/11 15:30] (current) – prisca | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | === Solution 1: one proposal per year per PI ==== | + | ==== Solution 1: one proposal per year per PI ==== |
| - | * Is it good for the science? | + | |
| * Reduce the diversity of ideas? Stifle risky, but imaginative proposals? | * Reduce the diversity of ideas? Stifle risky, but imaginative proposals? | ||
| * How many proposals are same PI | * How many proposals are same PI | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| * Size of collaborations, | * Size of collaborations, | ||
| * How do we track "new ideas" ? | * How do we track "new ideas" ? | ||
| - | * Would it improve success rates? | + | |
| * funding requested per proposal, $$ requested for successful vs unsuccessful | * funding requested per proposal, $$ requested for successful vs unsuccessful | ||
| * number of times proposed before success. | * number of times proposed before success. | ||
| * demographics on success vs unsuccessful | * demographics on success vs unsuccessful | ||
| - | * Would it reduce reviewer load? | + | |
| * number of proposals per group, per PI, per faculty vs research vs lab | * number of proposals per group, per PI, per faculty vs research vs lab | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | * Does it make it even more difficult to decide between a few very excellent must-fund proposals? | + | * Does it make it even more difficult to decide between a few very excellent must-fund proposals? |