Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials

User Tools


aaac:questions

This is an old revision of the document!


Back to AAAC Demographics Start page

What is the effect of reduced funding for individual research grants (relative to the overall funding profile)?

Specific Data

  • What do we expect to happen if the current trend continues unchecked?
  • Does it represent healthy competition and improve proposal quality?
  • Does it unfairly target younger researchers?
  • Does it reduce the number of scientists in the field?
  • Does it favor large projects over small projects? Is that good or bad?

Solution 1: one proposal per year per PI

  • Is it good for the science? Specific data
    • Reduce the diversity of ideas? Stifle risky, but imaginative proposals?
      • How many proposals are same PI
      • Rate of success of new PI
      • Do new PIs come up thru the ranks? How many proposals was a PI on as a senior researcher in the past.
      • Size of collaborations, relative number of small vs large collaborations
      • How do we track “new ideas” ?
  • Would it improve success rates?
    • funding requested per proposal, $$ requested for successful vs unsuccessful
    • number of times proposed before success. (and no success attempts)
    • demographics on success vs unsuccessful
  • Would it reduce reviewer load?
    • number of proposals per group, per PI, per faculty vs research vs lab
  • Would it create more PIs (proposals) from otherwise collaborating senior researchers?
  • Does it make it even more difficult to decide between a few very excellent must-fund proposals?

Solution 2: RFPs every other year

  • Is it good for the science?
    • Does it create funding gaps for tenure-seeking researchers and thus unfairly target a demographic we want to encourage?
    • Does it create uneven funding levels, loss of resources, lack of continuity in the off years?
  • Would it improve success rates?
    • Or create a multitude of poor proposals in the “on” year
  • Would the funding requested per proposal go up?
  • Would it reduce reviewer load?
    • Or create many more proposals in the “on” year?

Data we need

  • Who is writing the proposals?
    • PI position: e.g. postdoc, assist. Prof, assoc. Prof, tenured faculty, research faculty, Gender, race/ethnicity, geographical location, size of institution
  • How many proposals submitted by same PI (broken down by PI category)
  • Number of senior researchers on proposal
    • per year, per category of PI, per funding requested
  • Compare success rates of different sorts of proposals
    • per PI category, per number of senior researchers, per number of proposals submitted in the last 5 years, per funding requested
  • Years between proposals
    • cross correlate to success rate, PI category, # of senior researcher
  • Do younger researchers rise through the ranks (are researcher on proposal and then become PI later)?
    • Number of years between first appearance as senior researcher on a proposal to PI
aaac/questions.1410466606.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/09/11 15:16 by prisca