Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials

User Tools


engineering:apr29_11

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
engineering:apr29_11 [2011/04/22 10:02] – created 128.101.214.140engineering:apr29_11 [2011/04/29 10:24] (current) 174.253.147.178
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==== Agenda ==== ==== Agenda ====
  
-  * Summary of Materials Database work  with Loach (Anthony)  +  * Progress on database software (Loach) {{:engineering:loach.pdf|slides}} 
-  * Summary of FLUKA v GEANT (Tony Empl if possible+  * Summary of Materials Database work  with Loach (Anthony) {{:engineering:geant4fluka_aarm_anv.pdf|Geant4}}, {{:engineering:database_aarm_anv.pdf|Database}} 
 +  * Summary of FLUKA v GEANT[[http://pametime.dyndns.org/aarm/|Link]] (Tony Empl) 
   * Current status (update) on the AARMSim (Chao)   * Current status (update) on the AARMSim (Chao)
  
Line 8: Line 9:
   * Syracuse plans (Richard Schnee)   * Syracuse plans (Richard Schnee)
   * Plans for neutron measurements    * Plans for neutron measurements 
-  * * Soudan space and update on Neutron Multiplicity (Prisca)+    * Soudan space and update on Neutron Multiplicity (Prisca)
     * Plans for deployment of USD neutron detector (Oleg or DongMing ?)     * Plans for deployment of USD neutron detector (Oleg or DongMing ?)
-  * The view from SNOLab: specifically – what was the sense from the Marx committee and how was FAARM or low background counting in general presented and/or discussed (if at all) How much room do you have for a FAARM?  Can you imagine a staged FAARM from Soudan/Homestake ==> SNOLab?  Or should we have independent facilities? What about  LRT vs AARM as integrative units for the field? – basically, how might we fit into plans at SNOLab for low background counting? (Richard Ford or maybe a “guest lecture” from Nigel?)+  * The view from SNOLab (Richard Ford or Nigel Smith?) 
 +    * what was the sense from the Marx committee and how was FAARM or low background counting in general presented and/or discussed (if at all) How much room do you have for a FAARM?  Can you imagine a staged FAARM from Soudan/Homestake ==> SNOLab?  Or should we have independent facilities? What about  LRT vs AARM as integrative units for the field? – basically, how might we fit into plans at SNOLab for low background counting? 
  
engineering/apr29_11.1303484552.txt.gz · Last modified: 2011/04/22 10:02 by 128.101.214.140