Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| engineering:jul22_11 [2011/07/21 21:59] – 209.74.68.180 | engineering:jul22_11 [2011/09/16 09:05] (current) – 209.74.68.180 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==== Agenda ==== | ==== Agenda ==== | ||
| + | * August S4 Review: | ||
| * Summary of Materials Database work with Loach (Anthony) | * Summary of Materials Database work with Loach (Anthony) | ||
| - | * Summary of FLUKA v GEANT (Anthony {{: | + | * Summary of FLUKA v GEANT (Anthony {{: |
| * Current status (update) on the AARMSim (Chao) | * Current status (update) on the AARMSim (Chao) | ||
| * Possible paper from AARM work (Prisca) | * Possible paper from AARM work (Prisca) | ||
| * Plans for neutron measurements (Prisca, Chao, DongMing) | * Plans for neutron measurements (Prisca, Chao, DongMing) | ||
| - | * New work at Syracuse (Richard, Ray?) | + | * New work at Syracuse (Richard) |
| - | * Beta Cage plans update (Richard) | + | * Ray's start at SU has been pushed back to September 15 |
| + | * Plan is to continue/ | ||
| + | * New graduate student Yu Chen has begun study of NMM and simulations, will assess gamma backgrounds for Gd-loaded water neutron veto this summer (before | ||
| + | * Beta Cage {{: | ||
| * Next Teleconference | * Next Teleconference | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== S4 Review Info ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The presentations should include a report on the status, progress, and future plans for your project. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * scientific goals and associated design criteria; | ||
| + | * deliverables and technical progress during the past year; | ||
| + | * cost, schedule and staffing issues; | ||
| + | * plans and deliverables for the next year; | ||
| + | * future plans, which should include: | ||
| + | * the remaining work required to arrive at a baseline-quality design; | ||
| + | * a rough estimate of the resources this will require; | ||
| + | * the means by which you intend to seek support for continued design work after the S4 funds are exhausted; | ||
| + | * your response to recent events at the agencies related to DUSEL, including any siting options you might be considering; | ||
| + | * factors that will inform your decision-making on the direction your project will take over the next year and beyond. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. The format will basically follow that of last year’s review, with the addition this year of the discussion related to your future plans. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. The panel will base their review on the presentations you will make, and on your annual report covering the past year’s work. Please make sure you have all of this material in to me by Monday, August 8, 2011 (please cc Ramona Winkelbauer, | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. Note that Tuesday morning of the review will be dedicated to evaluating the physics program proposed in the DUSEL Preliminary Design Report submitted in May by U.C. Berkeley. | ||
| + | |||
| + | S4 Review {{: | ||
| + | |||