Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials

User Tools

Trace: • dm_task_force • feb4_14
engineering:jul22_11

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
engineering:jul22_11 [2011/07/22 08:31] – 184.10.242.63engineering:jul22_11 [2011/09/16 09:05] (current) – 209.74.68.180
Line 2: Line 2:
   * August S4 Review:  See details below   * August S4 Review:  See details below
   * Summary of Materials Database work  with Loach (Anthony)    * Summary of Materials Database work  with Loach (Anthony) 
-  * Summary of FLUKA v GEANT (Anthony {{:engineering:anv_AARM_Tele_GeantFluka_072211.pdf|early comparison}}, Tony Empl)+  * Summary of FLUKA v GEANT (Anthony {{:engineering:anv_AARM_Tele_GeantFluka_072211.pdf|early comparison}}, Tony Empl{{:engineering:lvd.png|lvd picture}})
   * Current status (update) on the AARMSim (Chao)   * Current status (update) on the AARMSim (Chao)
   * Possible paper from AARM work (Prisca)   * Possible paper from AARM work (Prisca)
Line 15: Line 15:
 ==== S4 Review Info ==== ==== S4 Review Info ====
  
-2.The presentations should include a report on the status, progress, and future plans for your project.  These should address, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:+The presentations should include a report on the status, progress, and future plans for your project.  These should address, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
  
-a. scientific goals and associated design criteria;  +  * scientific goals and associated design criteria;  
-b. deliverables and technical progress during the past year;  +  * deliverables and technical progress during the past year;  
-c. cost, schedule and staffing issues;  +  * cost, schedule and staffing issues;  
-d. plans and deliverables for the next year;  +  * plans and deliverables for the next year;  
-e. future plans, which should include: +  * future plans, which should include: 
-i. the remaining work required to arrive at a baseline-quality design;  +  * the remaining work required to arrive at a baseline-quality design;  
-ii. a rough estimate of the resources this will require;  +  * a rough estimate of the resources this will require;  
-iii. the means by which you intend to seek support for continued design work after the S4 funds are exhausted; +  * the means by which you intend to seek support for continued design work after the S4 funds are exhausted; 
-iv. your response to recent events at the agencies related to DUSEL, including any siting options you might be considering; and  +  * your response to recent events at the agencies related to DUSEL, including any siting options you might be considering; and  
-v. factors that will inform your decision-making on the direction your project will take over the next year and beyond.  +  * factors that will inform your decision-making on the direction your project will take over the next year and beyond.  
  
 3. The format will basically follow that of last year’s review, with the addition this year of the discussion related to your future plans.  A charge will be drafted during the next week or two, but the information above should allow you to begin putting together your presentations.  3. The format will basically follow that of last year’s review, with the addition this year of the discussion related to your future plans.  A charge will be drafted during the next week or two, but the information above should allow you to begin putting together your presentations. 
Line 33: Line 33:
  
 5. Note that Tuesday morning of the review will be dedicated to evaluating the physics program proposed in the DUSEL Preliminary Design Report submitted in May by U.C. Berkeley.  The S4 PIs are welcome to attend the presentations by the DUSEL project team on Tuesday morning, if they wish. 5. Note that Tuesday morning of the review will be dedicated to evaluating the physics program proposed in the DUSEL Preliminary Design Report submitted in May by U.C. Berkeley.  The S4 PIs are welcome to attend the presentations by the DUSEL project team on Tuesday morning, if they wish.
 +
 +S4 Review {{:engineering:s4review.xls|Agenda (xcel file)}}
  
engineering/jul22_11.1311341506.txt.gz · Last modified: 2011/07/22 08:31 by 184.10.242.63

Page Tools