Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| imagerteleconnotes20170724 [2017/07/25 16:45] – hanany | imagerteleconnotes20170724 [2017/07/30 19:10] (current) – hanany | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * {{:: | * {{:: | ||
| - | ___Actions:___ | + | __Actions:__ |
| - | * Brad will revisit EPIC-IM sidelobe analysis, will report next week on what is required to fire the analysis for CMBP. | + | * Brad will revisit EPIC-IM sidelobe analysis, will report next week on what is required to fire up the analysis for CMBP. |
| * UMN follow up on coma corrections for the Dragone telescope | * UMN follow up on coma corrections for the Dragone telescope | ||
| + | * UMN/Brad check on sidelobes for open Dragone system; Amy will check whether there is anyone at JPL to run GRASP | ||
| + | * Amy to provide feedback on sun-shield style, geometry, and explore deployable shields | ||
| __Notes: | __Notes: | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
| * Brad will revisit EPIC-IM sidelobe analysis and give a report next week. | * Brad will revisit EPIC-IM sidelobe analysis and give a report next week. | ||
| * Mike says they are exploring coma correction for the Dragone design that can increase DLFOV. Shaul says UMN is following this path as well. He points to a paper by him and Marrone in which they investigated these corrections awhile back. | * Mike says they are exploring coma correction for the Dragone design that can increase DLFOV. Shaul says UMN is following this path as well. He points to a paper by him and Marrone in which they investigated these corrections awhile back. | ||
| - | * Open Dragone as an option: better baffling, but at the expense of a larger primary. Jamie asks about DLFOV relative to the crossed Dragone and whether sidelobes have been investigated. Shaul says DLFOV is comparable to the Crossed design. No investigation of sidelobes have been done. | + | * Open Dragone as an option: better baffling, but at the expense of a larger primary. Jamie asks about DLFOV relative to the crossed Dragone and whether sidelobes have been investigated. Shaul says DLFOV is comparable to the Crossed design. No investigation of sidelobes have been done yet. |
| * Brad can do far sidelobes of the open dragone system; Amy will check whether there is anyone at JPL to do that as well. | * Brad can do far sidelobes of the open dragone system; Amy will check whether there is anyone at JPL to do that as well. | ||
| * Jamie is concerned about the sidelobes. The analysis showed that it was OK for EPIC, but just barely. | * Jamie is concerned about the sidelobes. The analysis showed that it was OK for EPIC, but just barely. | ||