Responsible party: Spherical Chicken, Anaximenes

To go back to the lecture note list, click lec_notes
previous lecture note: lec_notes_0925
next lecture note: lec_notes_0930

Main class wiki page: home

Monday, Sept. 28

The equation we use for our basis is

<math>\frac{d^2\psi}{d\xi^2} = \left(\xi^2 - k\right)\psi\left(\xi\right)</math>

Essentially, we started with the zero slop point, and then move a little right (for ground state, this is the x=0 point, top of concave down parabola). We start at <math>\frac{d\psi}{d\xi} = 0</math> for <math>\xi = 0 </math>

Then if k is large, the slope starts going down.

When

<math>\frac{d^2\psi}{d\xi^2} < 0 </math> the function will be concave down.

When <math>\frac{d^2\psi}{d\xi^2} > 0 </math> the function will be concave up.

When

<math>\frac{d^2\psi}{d\xi^2} = 0 </math> We have an inflection point.

An inflection point is the point in the function when the slope changes from concave up to concave down (or vice versa).

When we start the solving, we start with <math>\psi\left(xi\right) = 0</math>.

However when psi = 0, there is an inflection point as well. Also when the wave function = 0 there is an inflection point. (when the function drops below the x axis).

When <math>\xi >k </math> then <math>\left(\xi^2 - k\right)</math> is positive. Then <math>psi < 0 </math> .

Suppose k is slightly larger than the solved for value. At this point, the convexity is steeper and the function will not converge.

If Psi function touches the x axis, (when say k is slightly larger and raises the function up) then the function will continue to cross, be concave up, and grow to infinity. Of course then, the function cannot converge and hence is not normalizable.

The same is true if the K is just slightly smaller. The function's slope will go to zero, and then drop off to negative infinity. This as well cannot be normalized. Thus there are very special solutions of K. However we should not forget that there are multiple values for k. But for each K, the value is unstable and will go off to negative or positive infinity, and to a non-normalizable value.

Remember, <math>k = 2n + 1 </math> thus for n = 0,1,2… , k is 1, 3, 5….

For the SHO, as K becomes larger, the inflection points will be spread out (see a graph with the first, second and third energy states. The function slowly grows shorter, but longer). The final inflection point is where <math>\left(\xi^2 - k \right) = 0 </math>.

We remember that we got Xi^2 from kinetic energy, <math>\frac{1}{2}kd^2 </math> and the k from kinetic energy. thus <math> \frac{1}{2}kx^2 - PE = 0 </math>$$ Is the inflection point. So classically, in the case of the SHO, this is where the particle on the spring starts turning back from its expansion. There was a question prof. Kubota addressed, from an email or online, that asked how for the infinite square well, <math>E_n \sim n^2</math> However for the SHO <math>E \sim n</math> So -- Why do we lose a factor of n for the infinite square well vs. the SHO? The answer lies in remembering the equations for energy. <math> E \sim \frac{k^2 \hbar^2}{2m} </math> and since <math>k \sim n$$ then $$E \sim n^2</math> *It should be noted that I can't find a symbol for “proportional to” in latex – so I'm using the tilda symbol instead. but this is not to mean “roughly equivalent to” but “proportional to”.

However in an infinite square well, we lose the power of n. To understand how this works. imagine the physical representations of these two systems. for the infinite square well, the energy levels are raised up the ladder of a square box. However for the SHO, as the energy levels go up, they also get more room, because they are ladders in a parabola. Thus as E increases, the wave spreads out. So <math>\lambda \sim x </math> where x is the region between the two inflections, and <math>\lambda \sim \frac{\Delta\lambda}{n} \sim \sqrt n </math>

then <math>k \sim \sqrt n </math>

so when you square k, it turns out that

<math> E \sim n </math>

The key to this explanation being that in the SHO, the waves are not confined to the same space, but are allowed to spread out.

==For the quiz Friday, We are supposed to know the formulas in a general form, as well as to know that certain formulas exist for certain cases. If we have a problem remembering exact numbers or details, it is possible to ask the proctor for assistance, in which case he will help fill in what you already have for the equation. This is a no calculator quiz, as well. No extravagant calculations should be necessary.

–also – There are obviously some formatting errors I've not been able to finish yet. Anyone is welcome to help me out! (or I'll be trying to proof read it later. Yay for class!)

I didn't finish the notes for the start of the “Free Particle” either…

To go back to the lecture note list, click lec_notes
previous lecture note: lec_notes_0925
next lecture note: lec_notes_0930