Return to Q&A main page: Q_A
Q&A for the previous lecture: Q_A_1106
Q&A for the next lecture: Q_A_1111

If you want to see lecture notes, click lec_notes

Main class wiki page: home

Does anyone have any idea why E14 is a “interesting case” in part c of problem 4.2? I am guessing cause it has a high degeneracy, but I think I am missing something…

It's hard to give a direct answer without giving away the homework, so I'll do my best to get the point across.

Take for instance the energy level after the ones it asks us to solve for in the question. <math>E_7</math> has states of n = 3,2,2 respectively. This would give us 3 degenerate states, of energy <math>17 {\pi^2\hbar^2}/{2ma^2}</math>. For <math>E_8</math> we have an energy of <math>18 {\pi^2\hbar^2}/{2ma^2}</math>. The next energy level is <math>19 {\pi^2\hbar^2}/{2ma^2}</math>, then, however, the energy is <math>21 {\pi^2\hbar^2}/{2ma^2}</math>, as no combination of <math>n_x^2+n_y^2+n_z^2</math> can add to equal 20. As the energy level increases, there are some energy levels that cannot be reached, and some energy levels that may be able to be reached by more than one configuration of <math>n_x^2+n_y^2+n_z^2</math>s. Think about that for a while and it should come to you.

Can anyone tell me how to derive px, py, and pz in spherical coordinates?

Are you asking how to derive Lx, Ly, lz in spherical coordinates ? I didn't find the expression for px,py,pz in spherical coordinates system in the book.

No, I know how what Lx, Ly, and Lz are in spherical coordinates, I was just curious what px, py, and pz was. I saw this question asking for the px, py and pz in spherical coordinates, and couldn't figure it out. I found that if you just the expressions found for Lx, Ly, and Lz, you can just use L=r x p=rpsin(theta), and solve for p, which I think should work out.

This was tricky for me, too, just interpreting the problem. The algebra/calc isn't so bad, but it's extensive. Without giving away the entire problem, I'll help you with the major concept: The key is to use the product rule and substitute all of your (many) defined values into the definition for Lz. From the product rule we know that

<math>\frac{\partial}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial \rho} + \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} + \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi} </math>

Just find each of the derivatives above from the Cartesian to spherical conversion equations and work through the algebra. If your answer is very simple you've done it right. (I guess it's actually in the book)

Can someone tell me how Griffths found an expression for theta/phi hat in Cartesian components on page 168, equations 4.125(6). Does anyone know of quick tricks in finding these transformation of unit vectors from one coordinate system to another?

I have a very fundamental question about the material we have been covering in this class. I would like to know more about the time-independent potential assumption that we have been making. Since so many important results follow directly from it, just how different is quantum dynamics from time-independent QM? And how useful is quantum dynamics in applications? Of course, in reality, all potentials are time dependent, but I am guessing you can make a quasi-static assumption for time-dependence that is slow enough in comparison to the wavefunction time-dependence. Are there any phenomena for which you absolutely need to solve the time-dependent Schrodinger equation (whether numerically or analytically) to get a reasonably accurate result? And if so, what are they?

On page 147 of Griffiths, he uses the phrase “peel off the asymptotic behavior” when solving for the radial wave function for the hydrogen atom. Can anyone lend some insight as to what this phrase means?

This might be a bit late to ask for homework help, but I'm having some trouble with 4.6. First I assumed that l=l' (assuming that this yields the non-zero solution from the Kronecker delta),so I have <math>\int_{-1}^{1}P_{l}^{2}(x)\; dx </math> but then what do we do with the <math>\frac{d}{dx}</math> in the integral? Any hint would be appreciated!

Return to Q&A main page: Q_A
Q&A for the previous lecture: Q_A_1106
Q&A for the next lecture: Q_A_1111